Главная

 

The Institute of International Security and Informal Justice was established on November 4, 2018, as an association of highly qualified experts providing scientific and methodological support for the practical implementation of a global social and humane project for the Nravstvennoral path of humanity.

The Institute of International Security and Informal Justice studies interpersonal relationships and implements eco-social technologies that make these relationships harmless and conflict-free. The Institute addresses the problem of harmful human behavior, answering the question: "Why do people act badly toward each other, and what should be done to ensure that people build for each other and do not harm each other?" This is international security. Citizens around the world should not harm each other. This is ensured by the practical application of the informal justice method, based on discursive and evaluative practices involving group expert and mass ethical discussions and the assessment of the behavior of specific actors. This is how justice is established in international relations.

The Institute launches discourse and evaluates harmful actors and threats to human security. Through group expert and public discussion and negative assessment of a specific harmer, their rotation occurs. Their negative impact is reduced.

The Institute identifies sociopaths in international relations and proposes comprehensive measures to neutralize their harmful activity.

 

Director of the Institute of International Security and Informal Justice

Taalaibek Duishenovich Esenaliev

PhD

Academician of the Academy of Ecosocial Technologies

 

Taalai Duishenovich Esenaliev, PhD (studied and defended his dissertation at the Institute of Philosophy, Academy of Ecosocial Technologies, St. Petersburg). His research topic is "Philosophy of Humanity's Nravstvennoral Path," specializing in philosophy. He is a historian. He is a Master of Sports in hand-to-hand combat and has won prizes in Kyrgyzstan and Russia, at the All-Union Championship and international championships in hand-to-hand combat, combat sambo, full-contact karate, and absolute fights. He was the head coach of the National Hand-to-Hand Combat and Full-Contact Karate Team of the Kyrgyz National Football Club. He is also a World Champion in full-contact karate (Tokyo), an international master of sports, black belt, and 5th dan. He is also the President of the Central Asian Federation of Applied Sports.

Since August 1988, he has been the author and developer of the technology, fundamental principles, and general rules for the Games of Nomadic and Sedentary Peoples of the World (KON Games) under the auspices of the UN. Provides scientific and methodological support for the activities of the International Nomadic Committee.

Taalai Duishenovich Esenaliev summarized all religious and secular teachings and concepts, concluding that they have ceased to contribute to the reproduction of a humane person due to the destructive influence of the ideology of money: the belief in money as God, and the morally corrupt desire for personal enrichment by any means necessary. All the world's great humanitarian teachings have fallen victim to the ideology of money.

In this regard, the scholar substantiated new philosophical concepts characterizing humanity's Nravstvennoral path without lethal wars based on ecological discursive ethics. The philosophy of the Nravstvennoral path consists of a number of principles, rules, and methods: the global ecological principle (GEP) – man should not harm man; the global ethical principle (GEMP) – man should behave in a way that does not harm man; Nravstvennoral Rule III-C (do no harm to oneself (C1), neighbors (C2), or the environment (C3) by thought, word, or deed; create for oneself, neighbors, and the environment by thought, word, and deed); the discursive-evaluative method (all socially significant decisions should be discussed, evaluated through group expert and mass ethical assessments, then jointly implemented and adjusted from the perspective of Rule III-C).

Ecological discursive ethics constitutes the content of the moral person's worldview, incorporating traditional spiritual and Nravstvennoral values.

Nravstvennoral - this is compliance with the global ecological principle (GEP) in behavior - a person does not harm a person and the environment.

 

GLOBAL ETHICS

AS THE BASIS OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE

 

 

Before talking about global governance, we need to define global ethics. This is what the military-scientific school of V.A. Chigirev and P.I. Yunatskevich claims. It offers a new ethic for the way out of the crisis of all world systems, connected with global ecology: man should not harm man and the environment.

The vocabulary of heads of state, transnational and national corporations, and international organizations includes the utilitarian ethic of seeking profitable deals. 

However, relationships, including trade relationships, built on pragmatism alone (utilitarianism, monetarism, the primacy of the material over the spiritual) lead to the collapse of all deals. The scale of the crisis in business relations begins to grow when sociopaths (people without conscience and compassion) and psychopaths (people with obvious character defects, because of which they harm everyone around them) sneak into politics. They destroy all international treaties and agreements, do not fulfill their obligations, betray and sell each other out.

The global market is losing stability. Investment portfolios can no longer be insured. Each market participant must now find ways to insure their contracts and build new logistics. The stability of the economy has been reduced. The unpredictability of the behavior of global market regulators is growing. The global financial market began to need ethical regulation on a new basis. Mistrust has arisen towards a number of global currencies. Former allies have begun to harm each other.

Those who propose to behave according to the rules, change these rules themselves every day. Therefore, an initiative has arisen to form a new mechanism of global governance. However, without defining its ethical foundations, such a mechanism will not be created. It will be talked down, since it is impossible to restore trust in each other without forming joint intangible assets built on the basis of a global ethical principle: a person should not harm a person and the environment. Also, global governance requires a technology built on a method adequate to the object of governance.

In order to create a mechanism of global governance, to restore trust between former allies in the West and East, North and South, to stabilize the global economy, world and national markets, the military-scientific school of V.A. Chigirev and P.I. Yunatskevich has developed and offers global ethics. It includes a global ecological principle and a discursive-evaluative method.

Global ecological principle (GEP): a person should not harm himself, other people and the environment.

Discourse-evaluative method (DEM) is a method of regulating social relations based on group expert and mass assessment when discussing socially significant decisions.

Eight billion citizens of our planet Earth experience an acute shortage of justice, they want to establish moral order so that each person is protected from harm, social parasitism. The facts of mass violation of human rights and freedoms, the aggravation of inequality and the elimination of the middle class have shown everyone the imperfection of laws, courts, law enforcement practice. The existing system of international and national law can and should be supplemented with new ethics, which is based on the global ecological principle and the ecological nravstvennoral rule of three C (III-C) that follows from it:

 

C1- Don't harm yourself!

 

C2- Don't harm your neighbor!! Otherwise your neighbor will harm you.

 

C3- Don't harm the environment!!! Otherwise the environment will harm you.

 

In order not to harm yourself, you need not to harm other people and the environment - that is, to become ecological. Do not harm yourself - here and now - and you will ensure the ecology of the planet, your home and social environment. This guarantees a bright future for yourself and your descendants.

Ecology is about not causing harm to oneself, other people, and the environment. Others determine the life path of each person. They evaluate and discuss any citizen or (and) boss. If others establish that this specific citizen or (and) boss causes harm, then there is NO trust in him. Therefore, a saboteur who has lost trust immediately becomes an object of influence of others. This influence can be different, dangerous and even deadly. To avoid harm from others, a saboteur can save himself by becoming more ecological, that is, harmless to the environment and other people. For self-preservation of himself and the environment, it is important for him to stop harming others, so as not to harm himself in the end!!!

There is no bright, happy future for everyone. Everyone feels it – both rich and poor. The situation of everyone in the situation of loss of the ethical regulator, moral crisis is unstable. Harm can suddenly happen to anyone. Accumulation of money only attracts the negative social energy of the masses. Everything is possible here: lethal redistribution of property; robbery according to all the rules of jurisprudence; reprisals against descendants; desecration of treasures and wealth of entire generations of wealthy families, clans and families.

All big bosses are in a semantic, existential dead end. They are tired of constant intrigues, their own tyranny, they are fed up with their impunity, they feel the inevitability of their own catastrophe and the violation of the integrity of their physical shell. The way out of the existential dead end is the new global ethics - technology (GET).

Therefore, the need for a universal unifying idea and technology for its implementation has come. And such a global ideology-technology has been created – global ethics: people do not harm each other and the environment; they protect each other and the environment.

Global ethics is Nravstvennoi Path of Humanity. Both the poor and the rich, both the servant and the boss are ready to follow it, without harming each other; creating for each other.

If you have not followed the ecological moral path, then there will be few who will come to see you off on your final journey.

The individual, personal brake that holds one back from the desire to follow the ecological moral path and save oneself from harm caused by others are the following subjective reasons:

1) greed (remorse of greed);

2) envy of the one walking ahead on the ecological moral path;

3) mental modesty.

They (greed, envy, intellectual modesty) are the reasons for causing harm to oneself, neighbors, and the environment. 

They are also the reasons for harmful social parasitic, as well as sociopathic and psychopathic behavior. We propose the main condition for the onset of global peace - a new global ethics - technology.

 

Global Ethics - Technology (GET)

 

Global Ethics Technology (GET) includes the idea of non-harm by man to man and the environment, freely accepted and shared by the majority of the population of the Earth; and the associated procedure for measuring the environmental friendliness of the leaders of global management systems on planet Earth.

Environmental friendliness is measured in the process of environmental assessment. As a result, each leader of the global management system receives an individual ecoindices (EI), which is constantly adjusted in the process of discursive practices.

Individual ecoindices are used by citizens all over the world to protect the environment and ensure the safety of social relations.

Foundations of the new global ethics - technology (GET):

Global ecological principle (GEP): a person should not harm himself, other people and the environment.

Global Ethical Nravstvennoral Principle (GENP): a person must behave in such a way as not to cause harm to himself, other people and the environment.

Discursive-evaluative method (DEM) is a method of regulating social relations based on group expert and mass evaluation when discussing socially significant decisions.

Nravstvennoral rule III-C: do not harm yourself (C1), your neighbors (C2), or your environment (C3) by thought, word, or deed; create for yourself, your neighbors, and your environment by thought, word, and deed. 

The technology of new global ethics is based on the discursive-evaluative method (DEM), which consists of organizing broad participation of citizens in the discussion and evaluation of socially significant decisions from the positions of GEP, GENP, III-C.

 

Global governance, market and peace

 

Global governance, the market and the world will become stable when everyone begins to follow the moral rule: create - do no harm.

There is harm - there is no trust. And when there is no trust, there is no governance, no market, and no peace. Therefore, the basis of global governance, the foundation of the global market and peace, public peace, the stability of socio-economic relations, world and national currencies, human health is the social process described by the formula:

 

DEM + III-C = Global Management, Market and Peace

 

Any capital strives for safe development. This is impossible without global ethics. The demand for safety, insurance of investment projects and portfolios is guaranteed only by global ethics – technology (GET):

 

DEM + GET (III-C)

 

Organizing and participating in this creative process will allow the process of global governance to be given an ecological, nravstvennoral, coordinating principle. This is the only way to stabilize the global market and restore trust in world currencies, establish moral and legal order, stop bloody wars, stop the killing of man by man in the present, and thus guarantee a bright Future for everyone.

Global ethics will stabilize the world monetary system and logistics. Sustainable growth of all economies will begin, especially in underdeveloped countries. The well-being of the world's population will rise. The rich will become richer, the poor will stop living in poverty. Conflicts will move from the lethal plane to a non-lethal humane confrontation. Instead of hitting the opponent on the skull, they will hit his arguments. Everything will be regulated by general discussion and assessment from the position of the global ecological principle: man must not harm man and the environment.

 

Divisions of the Institute of International Security and Informal Justice

 

DEPARTMENT OF PEACEKEEPING AND HUMANITARIAN COOPERATION

 

The Department of Peacekeeping and Humanitarian Cooperation participates in peacekeeping activities and organizes humanitarian cooperation among countries.

Department Objectives:

Participation in peacekeeping operations;

Organization of humanitarian cooperation;

Assistance in the implementation of the global humane social project of the nravstvennoral path of humanity.

Nravstvennoral - this is compliance with the global ecological principle (GEP) in behavior - a person does not harm a person and the environment.Carrying out diplomatic missions and conducting international negotiations.

Recruiting personnel to implement the goals and objectives of the Department;

Training personnel in the specialties of the Institute of International Security and Informal Justice:

International security;

Informal justice;

Peacekeeping;

International relations.

Qualifications:

International security specialist;

Lawyer;

Diplomat;

Peacekeeper.

The Department has the right to conduct international negotiations on the practical implementation of the global humane social project of the nravstvennoral path of humanity.

 

Pavel Vladimirovich Kim

Head of the Department of Peacekeeping and Humanitarian Cooperation

Institute of International Security and Informal Justice

Colonel of the Medical Service

Corresponding Member of the Academy of Ecosocial Technologies

Adviser to the Chairman of the Union of Russian Paratroopers

Adviser to the Chairman of the Committee on Internationalist Soldiers under the CIS Council of Heads of Government

 

DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL SECURITY

 

Olga Dmitrievna Golub

Director of the Department of International Security

Institute of International Security and Informal Justice

Blocking Ecosocial Technology (BEST) is a sociopath neutralization tool developed in the USSR (V.A. Chigirev, P.I. Yunatskevich, 1990) and used in psychological and psychiatric support for military professional selection for the USSR's strategic forces (Strategic Missile Forces, Aerospace Forces), as well as in the training and professional deployment of military specialists. Blocking Ecosocial Technology in government and military management is a tool for ensuring state security and defense against sociopaths, who lead any system toward catastrophe, confrontation, and war.

In order for ecosocial technology to be humane, its application is correct not only for assessing the behavior of ordinary citizens, but also for reflecting the feedback of social connections to the subjects of management (leaders). It is this social group that is the object of public attention, and their decisions go through discursive-evaluative practices, which automatically improves them, makes them adequate to the demands of humanity for peace and well-being.

Blocking Ecosocial Technology (BEST) allows forbidding harmful actions of social subjects. It keeps a person, a separate group of people, humanity from a catastrophe associated with the activities of sociopaths and psychopaths.

BEST for each citizen:

personally take the nravstvennoral path, stop harming yourself, other people and the environment;

saw, felt harm - say "no" in thought, word, deed. Express disagreement with the tyranny of sociopaths. Ignore the information garbage and lies that sociopaths spread. Make your own assessments, and do not forward other people's thoughts;

discuss and evaluate sociopaths in discursive-evaluative networks. An example of such a network: Global Nravstvennorality GN (https://globalnrav.ast.social);

invite as many other citizens, specialists, and experts as possible to the discussion and evaluation; the onset of blocking the parasitic harmful activity of a sociopath who has become the object of a group expert and mass ethical evaluation depends on the number and quality of participants in the discussion and evaluation;

actively inform society by all means of communication about the results of the condemnation and evaluation of a particular sociopath.

Then a blocking effect called visualization of negative civil consent will kick in. All citizens agree that sociopaths are to blame for everything.

Andrey Yuryevich Potapov

Senior International Security Expert

Department of International Security

Institute of International Security and Informal Justice

 

Legal Department

 

The Legal Department (hereinafter referred to as the Department) is a structural subdivision of the Institute of International Security and Informal Justice (hereinafter referred to as the Institute).

The Department is guided by current international law.

The Department operates in collaboration with the Institute's other subdivisions, as well as, within its competence, with international organizations and national executive bodies, local governments, public associations, and other organizations.

The Department's main responsibilities are:

Providing legal support for the Institute's activities;

Implementing work related to the improvement of international and regional law;

Coordinating the Institute's lawmaking, including legislative drafting;

Coordinating human rights work at the Institute.

The Department, within its competence and in accordance with the tasks assigned to it, performs the following functions in accordance with the established procedure:

Prepares or participates in the preparation of draft international legal acts and regional laws;

Conducts legal review of acts of international organizations;

Conducts anti-corruption assessments of regulatory legal acts;

Independently prepares opinions on draft regulatory legal acts submitted to the Institute;

Participates in the development of proposals to improve international relations and ensure international security.

Director of the Legal Department

Radislav Voldemarovich Chekhov

 

 

The Department focuses on informal justice to ensure international security, minimize lethal conflict, and prevent world wars.

The concepts of "informal law" and "informal justice" were proposed by scholars P.I. Yunatskevich and V.A. Chigirev.

The sources of informal law are assessments, reasoning, and discussions within the highest structures of state and financial power, discursive and evaluative environments (social and evaluative networks), which modulate the behavioral practices of citizens and organizations.

Informal law structures are transboundary. Using discursive-evaluative networks, they track the movements of criminals and offenders and pursue them worldwide, informing citizens, police, forensic experts, and governments of various countries about the threatening movement of an unscrupulous business participant (potential criminal). They warn and signal others about the appearance of a criminal in a particular part of the world, in a particular state. Informal law structures are effectively autonomous. They can independently decide on the punishment of a criminal who has not been deterred from violating the laws of formal and informal law. A criminal cannot find refuge from the pursuit of informal law structures (the discursive-evaluative and social-evaluative network) anywhere in the world.Informal law structures effectively complement formal and informal legal organizations. The "terrible whisper of discourse" frightens criminals. They fear public discussion and moral condemnation, which lead to a loss of reputation and the subsequent launch of formal legal organizations (investigation, conviction, and punishment). Criminals develop a sense of guilt and remorse ("Why did I do that?").

Informal law structures will become a practical ethical regulator of behavior, making the work of informal and formal legal structures more effective, humane, and fair. They can be used as a basis for modernizing existing penitentiary systems.

The use of the discursive-evaluative method in legal science will lead to a balance between the theoretical constructs of legal science, human rights, and the customs and traditions of the socio-cultural community. The "war of all against all" will shift to a more humane plane of discursive-evaluative procedures, during which legally imperfect subjects (there are simply no perfect ones) will improve other, more imperfect subjects, and thus improve their own culture of legal behavior.

During their development, for various reasons, they were unable to imitate or assimilate social instincts and behavioral habits beneficial to society. This deficiency is compensated for by a developed ability to deceive, abuse the trust of others, and accept and then not fulfill contractual obligations.

Representative Office of the Institute of International Security and Informal Justice in the Kyrgyz Republic

Bachelor's and Master's degree programs in the following academic specialties:

Executive Director of the Institute of International Security and Informal Justice